fbpx Civil Society | Reconstructing Judaism

Jewish Clergy Letter in Support of Right to Protest

News

Over 800 Jewish clergy from across the Jewish spectrum signed the following letter, including over 200 members of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association. Among the signers  are Rabbi Deborah Waxman, president of Reconstructing Judaism; Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism; Rabbi Hara Person, chief executive of the Reform movement’s Central Conference of American Rabbis; and Rabbi Jacob Blumenthal, chief executive of the Conservative Rabbinical Assembly. The Times of Israel reported on the letter on June 11, 2020. 

The text of the letter follows.

As Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said, to march is to pray with our feet. Throughout American history, the right to protest peacefully has been a hallmark of free expression. In the past week, clergy of all faiths have joined in and supported protests happening in cities nationwide, spurred by the death of George Floyd at the hands of police. Like Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, Dreasjon “Sean” Reed and too many others to name, Mr. Floyd was a victim of the nation’s long history of brutality against people of color, and particularly Black men. Protests are a just response to all-too-familiar anger, frustration, and pain. I stand for the right to peaceful protest and call on our nation’s law enforcement and elected officials not to interfere with this bedrock First Amendment expression.

Pursuing Justice

Joint Statement of Solidarity by Jewish Communal Organizations

Endorsement

 

Reconstructing Judaism and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association were about 180 Jewish communal organizations issuing a statement urging our political leaders and all our fellow Americans to treat this public health crisis as a moment for kindness and solidarity, and to make extra efforts to reach towards one another in support, not look to blame or scapegoat.

Statement Against Cut in Nutritional Aid

News
Reconstructing Judaism and Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association logos
 
Reconstructing Judaism and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association join our friends at MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger in denouncing the Trump Administration’s final rule to strip nutritional benefits for nearly 700,000 food-insecure Americans. Hunger is not a political tool to be played with. Food security is a human right. We strongly endorse the important message Mazon has shared in their statement of December 4th, 2019, shared in full below: 
 

Logo for Mazon: A Jewish Response to Hunger

“In response to the Trump Administration’s announcement today to restrict nutrition benefits for nearly 700,000 Americans, MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger expressed its anger that the Administration has cruelly and needlessly restricted access to the most basic of human needs for those who are among our nation’s most vulnerable. So-called “able-bodied adults without dependents” or “ABAWDS” will now be denied Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) after three months, unless they can find work. Hunger is not and has never been a meaningful incentive to find employment when employment is not there to be had.

Currently, “ABAWDs” must meet specific work requirements in order to access three months of SNAP benefits in a thirty-six-month period. For the past twenty years, states have been given flexibility to waive this three-month time limit in areas with high unemployment or insufficient jobs. USDA’s Final Rule removes these important protections and would result in unprecedented cuts to the country’s most successful and important anti-hunger program.

“We are appalled at the persistent attacks by this Administration to purposefully make life more difficult for those struggling with hunger, especially those populations that are often overlooked and who have unique barriers to employment, including veterans, those living in rural America or on Tribal Lands and college students. USDA’s rule change does nothing to encourage ‘self-sufficiency’ and instead provides a blistering reminder of what can only be described as a deliberately pernicious strategy to undercut already marginalized populations that deserve our support instead of mandated restrictions to critically needed food,” said Abby J. Leibman, President & CEO of MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger.

Earlier this year, MAZON submitted formal comments to USDA about this proposal and coordinated a letter signed by 60 Members of Congress, citing the negative impact this regulatory change would have on vulnerable Americans.

Those comments highlighted the difficulty in finding employment for so many Americans despite a desire to do so. Among those “ABAWDS” who personify this struggle, America’s veterans often struggle in silence. An estimated 1.4 million veterans live in households that participate in SNAP; however, veterans often struggle to find jobs that match their skills, especially if they have little work experience beyond military service. Furthermore, many recently-transitioning veterans take temporary jobs but struggle to find full-time sustained work—these individuals might not be able to report 20 hours of work per week in order to receive SNAP benefits.

Leibman said, “Ensuring that all veterans, especially those with undiagnosed or hidden disabilities, have access to adequate and nutritious food is critical and is the least this nation owes to its returning and injured soldiers. Too often, these brave men and women face unique challenges in securing full-time work when their military service ends. Not having the support to put food on the table during these times is unconscionable. What a terrible way to treat those who have defended our liberties.”

This rule change would also exacerbate hunger among Native Americans, an already vulnerable and frequently overlooked population. One in four Native Americans is food insecure (double the national average of one in eight people). Despite reports of high employment nationally, unemployment remains a huge issue in Indian Country, in some cases as high as 21%. SNAP waivers for these communities literally save lives.

“MAZON will do everything we can to continue to fight against this regulatory attack, because no matter a person’s circumstance, no one deserves to be hungry,” Leibman said.” 

Letter Opposing Rollback of Predatory Lending Protections

Endorsement

 

Reconstructing Judaism and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Assocation were among seventeen Jewish organizations writing to the Consumer Protection Finance Bureau in opposition to an administration proposal to rescind protections against predatory lending.

Statement Opposing Restrictions on Food Aid

Endorsement

 

Reconstructing Judaism joined 35 national faith-based organizations in a statement opposing attempts to restrict states from providing food aid to the hungry.

Letter Opposing Repeal of Johnson Amendment (April 2019)

Endorsement

 

Reconstructing Judaism and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association were among 131 organizations sending a letter to the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committes, urging them not to repeal or weaken the “Johnson Amendment” that currently ensures that tax-exempt organizations do not support or oppose candidates for political office.

Letter Opposing Repeal of Johnson Amendment

Endorsement

 

Reconstructing Judaism and the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association were among 109 organizations sending a letter to the House of Representatives, urging them not to repeal or weaken the “Johnson Amendment” that currently ensures that tax-exempt organizations do not support or oppose candidates for political office.

B’tselem Elohim: Jewish Ethics, Sexual Harassment and the Workplace of the Future

News

This article by David Teutsch, Mira Wasserman, and Deborah Waxman was originally published on December 15, 2017 as the lead feature in eJewishPhilanthropy at the following address: http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/btselem-elohim-jewish-ethics-sexual-harassment-and-the-workplace-of-the-future.

The #metoo campaign is an unprecedented demonstration of the difference that good people can make when they come together to seek justice. From Hollywood to Congress, powerful people are reckoning with patterns of abuse and domination that went unaddressed for generations.

The outpouring of truth-telling has already toppled perpetrators in politics, entertainment, and the media. This is a moment of decision. If #metoo is to bring lasting change to every corner of society, extending safety and justice not just to those who garner media attention, but also to the women and girls who remain the most vulnerable to harassment and assault, now is the time for turning brave speech into effective action. This moment confronts us with the urgency of making our workplaces, homes, and communities spaces where all women, children and men can flourish. In Jewish life, there is a new readiness to address past wrongs and change organizational cultures. How can the wisdom of Jewish tradition guide us in this moment of decision and possibility?

The most basic thing Jewish tradition teaches us about human beings is that we are all fashioned b’tselem Elohim, in the image of God. Disrespecting another person inevitably involves failing to see the divine element in the other. It is wrong to treat anyone as an object; every person has inherent kavod, dignity. From this perspective, it should be obvious that sexual harassment in all its forms is wrong. Repeated propositioning, coercive pressure, unwanted touching and physical violence are all completely unacceptable.

Unfortunately, this core message of Jewish ethics has sometimes been eclipsed by a sensibility that protects the reputations of powerful individuals at all costs. This is a grave misreading of the Jewish ethical tradition. Jewish tradition places a strong value on avoiding l’shon hara, speech that, while true, will lessen the hearer’s opinion of another person. But this value is not an absolute principle. One is enjoined to do l’shon hara in the form of warning (azhara) to save someone from danger, whether it is physical, emotional or financial. One is also required to offer tokhekha, reproof, when someone has done something wrong and should be urged to do t’shuva, to apologize and not to repeat such behavior in the future. The Mishneh Torah, Maimonides’ code of Jewish law, even goes so far as to say that one who fails to offer rebuke bears responsibility for the sin (Deot 6:7). Thus, from a Jewish perspective it is imperative that we face harassers and harassment in all their guises and do what we can to put an end to these demeaning and destructive behaviors.

One way that contemporary secular law has been used to avoid azhara is the use of confidentiality agreements as part of financial settlements. Such confidentiality agreements ought to be prohibited by law so that repeat offenders – and most offenders are repeat offenders – can be detected and dealt with. Banning confidentiality agreements would have aided in identifying pedophiles in the Catholic Church. It would have also bared Harvey Weinstein’s evildoing years ago.

The current tidal wave of women speaking out may mark a sea change in how American society deals with these issues. However, women speaking up is not enough. There must be a vast increase in education and training around these issues in schools, corporations and institutions of all kinds if such behavior is to be banished. Such programs must examine the way that the assertion of power, an inflated sense of entitlement and objectification of women are essential parts of sexual exploitation.

In a world where a president can be elected despite talking on camera about grabbing women’s private parts, we have a long way to go. When a major political party pours money into a senatorial race to support a candidate who has been banned from a mall for harassing teenage girls, we know that the old-boy mechanisms are still in place. Such men have been in denial when they should be experiencing shame, and they have a broad cohort of people who support them in their denial.

Women in recent weeks who have spoken out about what has happened to them have forced a significant number of men to acknowledge wrongdoing, but it is striking how often such apologies have been imprecise and generic: “I apologize if I hurt anyone.” Much of the time these men are so accustomed to treating women as objects that they are genuinely unaware of the psychological damage they have done to their victims. These men show a startling lack of empathy. Otherwise they would be unwilling to inflict such harm. Unless men come to see women as subjects rather than objects, only the fear of embarrassment and punishment will affect their conduct, and that would be insufficient to stop it. Making permanent change requires re-education of men – athletes, executives, actors, politicians, laborers and schoolboys. It also requires the creation of circumstances that protect women who speak out.

Permanent change also requires policy changes. Partly to avoid lawsuits and partly to protect productivity, more organizations are adopting policies regarding relationships among employees, use of demeaning language, safe reporting mechanisms, and so on. Such policies ought to be adopted by all employers and organizations. Responsible leadership involves checking to ensure that such policies are in place, that everyone in the organization knows about them, and that they are enforced in a way that protects complainants from retribution.

In Jewish organizations, female staff members are sometimes subjected to sexist treatment and outright harassment by board members and other volunteers. Some of the worst behavior of this kind has been exhibited by wealthy donors who expect “special treatment” in light of their gifts, creating awkward and unpleasant situations for women who do fundraising. This will only stop when senior executives, and particularly senior male executives, step in and make it clear that such conduct is unacceptable. Of course it takes moral courage to do so because there is a risk that a major donor may walk away from the organization, but the integrity of the organization and the safety of its staff and volunteers ought to take precedence. The obligation to protect the kavod, dignity, of others and the obligation to offer tokhekha ought to take precedence in every Jewish organization.

While it is true that the overwhelming number of sexual harassment incidents involves men treating women, people of all gender identities and sexual orientations are victimized. When men and boys are harassed and exploited, they might be fearful to come forward because of notions of masculinity and entrenched homophobia in our society. Homophobia also contributes to the harassment of lesbians, who might be targeted precisely because they are not sexually available to men. Protection for all whistle blowers and swift and meaningful punishments are needed if the impact of #metoo is to be long-lasting.

One of the steps needed to ensure that the changes underway retain their momentum is to ensure that the consequences are appropriate to the crimes. Unwanted touching is morally reprehensible, but it is not nearly as heinous as rape or child molestation. The frequency of wrongdoing, its seriousness, the age of the victim and the impact on the victim and on the broader environment all deserve careful consideration when deciding how to respond. Speedy, thorough investigations, measured punishments, and public disclosure are part of what is needed to bring the changes American society needs to sustain our commitment to human dignity.

When Jewish organizations attempt to protect perpetrators rather than call them to account, we compound the injury to those who have been harmed. While certain ethical violations are appropriately addressed by employers, allegations of criminal wrong-doing should be adjudicated in courts of law. Yet another response – particularly when crimes occurred long in the past – is to pursue a course of restorative justice. This is an approach that brings victims, offenders, and community members together to make a plan for restitution and reconciliation. This approach aligns with Jewish ethical teachings in that it seeks justice for victims even as it supports offenders in pursuing t’shuva.

What we are saying, in short, is that Jewish ethics requires us to do proper education and training around these issues; that organizations of all sorts must have procedures in place to do swift and fair investigations and mete out appropriate punishments; that people who come forward with complaints must be protected; that leaders have an obligation to create an atmosphere that actively discourages abuses of power; and that Jewish leadership requires the ongoing defense of human dignity. With all those changes, harassment will finally become fully disreputable in all its forms – from cat-calls on the street to propositions at work, from ogling to touching to outright violence.

The #metoo campaign has brought us to the threshold of a transformative shift in our culture. Brave women, children and men have taken the risk of telling the truth, offering reproof to harassers and abusers and to the leaders and institutions that have protected them. Let’s work together to ensure that these acts of bravery become a foundation for lasting change.

Rabbi David Teutsch, Ph.D., is the former president of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College.
Rabbi Mira Wasserman, Ph.D., directs the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Colllege’s Center for Jewish Ethics.
Rabbi Deborah Waxman, Ph.D., is president of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College & Jewish Reconstructionist Communities.

 

Faith Voices Letter in Support of Keeping Houses of Worship Non-Partisan

Endorsement

 

Reconstructionist leaders were among the more than 4000 signatories to a letter urging the U.S. Senate not to repeal or weaken current law that prevents tax-exempt religious organizations from partisan political endorsements.

Rabbi Deborah Waxman Speaks to Faith Leaders on Solidarity

News

Rabbi Deborah Waxman spoke from a Jewish perspective to faith leaders during a 11/28/2016 call on “Faith and Solidarity during a time of White Supremacy.” Her comments were part of a conference call sponsored by Faith In The Public Sphere.


Broad swaths of the liberal American Jewish community are struggling—with so many others— with the interruption of a trajectory of acceptance, equality, inclusion, justice in America. We are struggling to find a balance between our knowledge of Jewish history—millennia-old and more recent—of persecution, expulsion, even genocide, with our experience and belief in America as different. One reason many of us have believed that America is different is because this is the first place Jews have lived in the past 2,000 years where religion is not the primary fault line. In Europe, where the dominant culture was Christianity, Jews have always been the “other,” and have paid a very high price.

I follow the thinking of scholar Hasia Diner, who asserts that here in America, race has been the major fault line, and this is the difference that has created an unprecedented space for Jews to flourish. But the Jewish people are multiracial, through birth, conversion, adoption and intermarriage, and the Jewish embrace of “whiteness” has been marginalizing for Jews of color. Impelled in part by BLM, segments of the American Jewish community are finally beginning to grapple with the fact that not all Jews descend from the Eastern European Ashkenazi majority who migrated in late 19th and early 20th century. Over the last few years, the Jewish community has begun to move toward substantive changes in behaviors and beliefs around what scholar Eric Goldstein calls “the price of whiteness.”

And then this election…The non-Orthodox Jewish community, which makes up a tremendous majority of American Jews, voted in overwhelming numbers not just against Trump but pro-actively for Hillary. We voted that way out of our own self-interest and out of solidarity and support with other diverse groups across American society, many of whom were maligned during the campaign. We voted out of our belief in that trajectory of equality, inclusion and justice and out of our recognition that we must partner with the divine to bring it to life. And we are struggling now—out of our own anxiety, out of concern for other minority populations, and out of concern for the well-being of American values and institutions.

So we are watching the alarming spike in hate speech directed at Muslims, African-Americans and, yes, Jews. And we are anxious at the appointments and the hints at policy changes, and how they will affect everyone who is not white, who is not Christian, who is not male, who is not straight, who is not cis-gender, who is not able-bodied, who does not have all the right documents.

And we are struggling to discern how to act most strategically and most effectively. How to do the heshbon hanefesh—the soul-searching—that will enable us to learn what we need to learn from this staggering election and undo the damage to that essential and hopeful trajectory. How to respond out of a place of partnership and power and not out of our past trauma. How to raise up Jewish wisdom so that it can help illuminate all of us in this dark time. Remember you were once a slave in Egypt. Take care of the orphan and the widow. Treat your workers justly. Cherish that every human being is created in the image of the divine. 

Even as we are still discerning, I will share that I am heartened at broad trends I see across the liberal Jewish community. Overwhelmingly, there is recognition that other communities are far more at risk than we are and that we must act in solidarity and partnership. Dozens upon dozens of rabbis and Jewish communal leaders are monitoring the possibility of an unconstitutional registry for Muslims and have vowed, as I do here, to sign up if such a horror comes to pass.

Countless synagogue leaders along with many other people of faith are already investigating how to establish themselves as sanctuaries depending on new immigration policies. Intracommunal Jewish battles are, in many cases, decreasing in importance as we focus on the threat to the American values that we all hold dear.

The Jewish community needs non-Jews to understand and repudiate anti-Semitism as a form of oppression—on the right and on the left. Anti-Semitism is old and virulent and is a mainstay of white supremacism. We are working—at times with grace and at times clumsily—to deepen and in some instances establish partnerships on anti-oppression work. We want to be good allies and we want to find good allies in the work of progressive moral and religious leadership.

President, Reconstructing Judaism; Aaron and Marjorie Ziegelman Presidential Professor, Reconstructionist Rabbinical College
Subscribe to RSS - Civil Society